| Contents | Prev | Next | Index | Java Language Specification Second Edition |
CHAPTER 8
Class declarations define new reference types and describe how they are implemented (§8.1).
A nested class is any class whose declaration occurs within the body of another class or interface. A top level class is a class that is not a nested class.
This chapter discusses the common semantics of all classes-top level (§7.6) and nested (including member classes (§8.5, §9.5), local classes (§14.3) and anonymous classes (§15.9.5)). Details that are specific to particular kinds of classes are discussed in the sections dedicated to these constructs.
A named class may be declared abstract (§8.1.1.1)
and must be declared abstract if it is incompletely implemented;
such a class cannot be instantiated, but can be extended by subclasses. A class
may be declared final (§8.1.1.2),
in which case it cannot have subclasses. If a class is declared
public, then it can be referred to from other packages.
Each class except Object is an extension of
(that is, a subclass of) a single existing class (§8.1.3)
and may implement interfaces (§8.1.4).
The body of a class declares members (fields and methods and nested classes
and interfaces), instance and static initializers, and constructors (§8.1.5).
The scope (§6.3)
of a member (§8.2)
is the entire declaration of the class to which the member belongs. Field,
method, member class, member interface, and constructor declarations may include
the access modifiers (§6.6)
public, protected, or private. The
members of a class include both declared and inherited members (§8.2).
Newly declared fields can hide fields declared in a superclass or
superinterface. Newly declared class members and interface members can hide
class or interface members declared in a superclass or superinterface. Newly
declared methods can hide, implement, or override methods declared in a
superclass or superinterface.
Field declarations (§8.3)
describe class variables, which are incarnated once, and instance variables,
which are freshly incarnated for each instance of the class. A field may be
declared final (§8.3.1.2),
in which case it can be assigned to only once. Any field declaration may include
an initializer.
Member class declarations (§8.5) describe nested classes that are members of the surrounding class. Member classes may be static, in which case they have no access to the instance variables of the surrounding class; or they may be inner classes (§8.1.2).
Member interface declarations (§8.5) describe nested interfaces that are members of the surrounding class.
Method declarations (§8.4)
describe code that may be invoked by method invocation expressions (§15.12).
A class method is invoked relative to the class type; an instance method is
invoked with respect to some particular object that is an instance of the class
type. A method whose declaration does not indicate how it is implemented must be
declared abstract. A method may be declared final (§8.4.3.3),
in which case it cannot be hidden or overridden. A method may be implemented by
platform-dependent native code (§8.4.3.4).
A synchronized method (§8.4.3.6)
automatically locks an object before executing its body and automatically
unlocks the object on return, as if by use of a synchronized
statement (§14.18),
thus allowing its activities to be synchronized with those of other threads (§17).
Method names may be overloaded (§8.4.7).
Instance initializers (§8.6) are blocks of executable code that may be used to help initialize an instance when it is created (§15.9).
Static initializers (§8.7) are blocks of executable code that may be used to help initialize a class when it is first loaded (§12.4).
Constructors (§8.8) are similar to methods, but cannot be invoked directly by a method call; they are used to initialize new class instances. Like methods, they may be overloaded (§8.8.6).
ClassDeclaration: ClassModifiersopt class Identifier Superopt Interfacesopt ClassBodyThe Identifier in a class declaration specifies the name of the class. A compile-time error occurs if a class has the same simple name as any of its enclosing classes or interfaces.
ClassModifiers: ClassModifier ClassModifiers ClassModifier ClassModifier: one of public protected private abstract static final strictfpNot all modifiers are applicable to all kinds of class declarations. The access modifier public pertains only to top level classes (§7.6) and to member classes (§8.5, §9.5), and is discussed in §6.6, §8.5 and §9.5. The access modifiers protected and private pertain only to member classes within a directly enclosing class declaration (§8.5) and are discussed in §8.5.1. The access modifier static pertains only to member classes (§8.5, §9.5). A compile-time error occurs if the same modifier appears more than once in a class declaration.
If two or more class modifiers appear in a class declaration, then it is customary, though not required, that they appear in the order consistent with that shown above in the production for ClassModifier.
abstract Classesabstract class is a class that is incomplete, or to be considered
incomplete. Only abstract classes may have abstract
methods (§8.4.3.1,
§9.4),
that is, methods that are declared but not yet implemented. If a class that is
not abstract contains an abstract method, then a
compile-time error occurs. A class C has abstract methods if any of
the following is true:
abstract method (§8.4.3).
abstract method that has
not been implemented (§8.4.6.1)
in C or any of its superclasses.
abstract) and C neither declares nor inherits a method that
implements it.
abstract class Point {
int x = 1, y = 1;
void move(int dx, int dy) {
x += dx;
y += dy;
alert();
}
abstract void alert();
}
abstract class ColoredPoint extends Point {
int color;
}
class SimplePoint extends Point {
void alert() { }
}
a class Point is declared
that must be declared abstract, because it contains a declaration
of an abstract method named alert. The subclass of
Point named ColoredPoint inherits the
abstract method alert, so it must also be declared
abstract. On the other hand, the subclass of Point
named SimplePoint provides an implementation of alert,
so it need not be abstract.
A compile-time error occurs if an attempt is made to
create an instance of an abstract class using a class instance
creation expression (§15.9).
Thus, continuing the example just shown, the statement:
would result in a compile-time error; the classPoint p = new Point();
Point cannot be instantiated because it is
abstract. However, a Point variable could correctly be
initialized with a reference to any subclass of Point, and the
class SimplePoint is not abstract, so the statement:
would be correct.Point p = new SimplePoint();
A subclass of an abstract class that is not
itself abstract may be instantiated, resulting in the execution of
a constructor for the abstract class and, therefore, the execution
of the field initializers for instance variables of that class. Thus, in the
example just given, instantiation of a SimplePoint causes the
default constructor and field initializers for x and y
of Point to be executed. It is a compile-time
error to declare an abstract class type such that it is not
possible to create a subclass that implements all of its abstract
methods. This situation can occur if the class would have as members two
abstract methods that have the same method signature (§8.4.2)
but different return types.
As an example, the declarations:
interface Colorable { void setColor(int color); }
abstract class Colored implements Colorable {
abstract int setColor(int color);
}
result in a compile-time error: it would be
impossible for any subclass of class Colored to provide an
implementation of a method named setColor, taking one argument of
type int, that can satisfy both abstract method
specifications, because the one in interface Colorable requires the
same method to return no value, while the one in class Colored
requires the same method to return a value of type int (§8.4).
A class type should be declared abstract only
if the intent is that subclasses can be created to complete the implementation.
If the intent is simply to prevent instantiation of a class, the proper way to
express this is to declare a constructor (§8.8.8)
of no arguments, make it private, never invoke it, and declare no
other constructors. A class of this form usually contains class methods and
variables. The class Math is an example of a class that cannot be
instantiated; its declaration looks like this:
public final class Math {
private Math() { } // never instantiate this class
. . . declarations of class variables and methods . . .
}
final Classesfinal if its definition is complete and no subclasses are
desired or required. A compile-time error occurs if the name of a
final class appears in the extends clause (§8.1.3)
of another class declaration; this implies that a
final class cannot have any subclasses. A compile-time error occurs
if a class is declared both final and abstract,
because the implementation of such a class could never be completed (§8.1.1.1).
Because a final class never has any
subclasses, the methods of a final class are never overridden (§8.4.6.1).
strictfp Classesstrictfp modifier is to make all float or
double expressions within the class declaration be explicitly
FP-strict (§15.4).
This implies that all methods declared in the class, and all nested types
declared in the class, are implicitly strictfp.
Note also that all float or double
expressions within all variable initializers, instance initializers,
static initializers and constructors of the class will also be explicitly
FP-strict.
To illustrate these rules, consider the example below:
class HasStatic{
static int j = 100;
}
class Outer{
class Inner extends HasStatic{
static final x = 3; // ok - compile-time constant
static int y = 4; // compile-time error, an inner class
}
static class NestedButNotInner{
static int z = 5; // ok, not an inner class
}
interface NeverInner{} // interfaces are never inner
}
Inner classes may inherit static members
that are not compile-time constants even though they may not declare them.
Nested classes that are not inner classes may declare static members freely, in
accordance with the usual rules of the Java programming language. Member
interfaces (§8.5)
are always implicitly static so they are never considered to be inner classes.
A statement or expression occurs in a static context if and only if the innermost method, constructor, instance initializer, static initializer, field initializer, or explicit constructor statement enclosing the statement or expression is a static method, a static initializer, the variable initializer of a static variable, or an explicit constructor invocation statement (§8.8.5).
An inner class C is a direct inner class of a class O if O is the immediately lexically enclosing class of C and the declaration of C does not occur in a static context. A class C is an inner class of class O if it is either a direct inner class of O or an inner class of an inner class of O.
A class O is the zeroth lexically enclosing class of itself. A class O is the nth lexically enclosing class of a class C if it is the immediately enclosing class of the n - 1st lexically enclosing class of C.
An instance i of a direct inner class C of a class O is associated with an instance of O, known as the immediately enclosing instance of i. The immediately enclosing instance of an object, if any, is determined when the object is created (§15.9.2).
An object o is the zeroth lexically enclosing instance of itself. An object o is the nth lexically enclosing instance of an instance i if it is the immediately enclosing instance of the n - 1st lexically enclosing instance of i.
When an inner class refers to an instance variable that is a member of a lexically enclosing class, the variable of the corresponding lexically enclosing instance is used. A blank final (§4.5.4) field of a lexically enclosing class may not be assigned within an inner class.
An instance of an inner class I whose declaration occurs in a static context has no lexically enclosing instances. However, if I is immediately declared within a static method or static initializer then I does have an enclosing block, which is the innermost block statement lexically enclosing the declaration of I.
Furthermore, for every superclass S of C which is itself a direct inner class of a class SO, there is an instance of SO associated with i, known as the immediately enclosing instance of i with respect to S. The immediately enclosing instance of an object with respect to its class' direct superclass, if any, is determined when the superclass constructor is invoked via an explicit constructor invocation statement.
Any local variable, formal method parameter or exception
handler parameter used but not declared in an inner class must be declared
final, and must be definitely assigned (§16)
before the body of the inner class.
Inner classes include local (§14.3), anonymous (§15.9.5) and non-static member classes (§8.5). Here are some examples:
class Outer {
int i = 100;
static void classMethod() {
final int l = 200;
class LocalInStaticContext{
int k = i; // compile-time error
int m = l; // ok
}
}
void foo() {
class Local { // a local class
int j = i;
}
}
}
The declaration of class
LocalInStaticContext occurs in a static context-within the static
method classMethod. Instance variables of class Outer
are not available within the body of a static method. In particular, instance
variables of Outer are not available inside the body of
LocalInStaticContext. However, local variables from the surrounding
method may be referred to without error (provided they are marked
final).
Inner classes whose declarations do not occur in a static context may freely
refer to the instance variables of their enclosing class. An instance variable
is always defined with respect to an instance. In the case of instance variables
of an enclosing class, the instance variable must be defined with respect to an
enclosing instance of that class. So, for example, the class Local
above has an enclosing instance of class Outer. As a further
example:
class WithDeepNesting{
boolean toBe;
WithDeepNesting(boolean b) { toBe = b;}
class Nested {
boolean theQuestion;
class DeeplyNested {
DeeplyNested(){
theQuestion = toBe || !toBe;
}
}
}
}
Here, every instance of
WithDeepNesting.Nested.DeeplyNested has an enclosing instance of
class WithDeepNesting.Nested (its immediately enclosing instance)
and an enclosing instance of class WithDeepNesting (its 2nd
lexically enclosing instance).
extends clause in a class declaration specifies the direct
superclass of the current class. A class is said to be a direct
subclass of the class it extends. The direct superclass is the class from
whose implementation the implementation of the current class is derived. The
extends clause must not appear in the definition of the class
Object, because it is the primordial class and has no direct
superclass. If the class declaration for any other class has no
extends clause, then the class has the class Object as
its implicit direct superclass.
Super: extends ClassTypeThe following is repeated from §4.3 to make the presentation here clearer:
ClassType: TypeNameThe ClassType must name an accessible (§6.6) class type, or a compile-time error occurs. If the specified ClassType names a class that is
final (§8.1.1.2),
then a compile-time error occurs; final classes are not allowed to
have subclasses.
class Point { int x, y; }
final class ColoredPoint extends Point { int color; }
class Colored3DPoint extends ColoredPoint { int z; } // error
the relationships are as follows:
Point is a direct subclass of Object.
Object is the direct superclass of the class
Point.
ColoredPoint is a direct subclass of class
Point.
Point is the direct superclass of class
ColoredPoint. Colored3dPoint causes a compile-time error because it attempts to
extend the final class ColoredPoint.
The subclass relationship is the transitive closure of the direct subclass relationship. A class A is a subclass of class C if either of the following is true:
class Point { int x, y; }
class ColoredPoint extends Point { int color; }
final class Colored3dPoint extends ColoredPoint { int z; }
the relationships are as follows:
Point is a superclass of class
ColoredPoint.
Point is a superclass of class
Colored3dPoint.
ColoredPoint is a subclass of class
Point.
ColoredPoint is a superclass of class
Colored3dPoint.
Colored3dPoint is a subclass of class
ColoredPoint.
Colored3dPoint is a subclass of class
Point. extends or
implements clause of C either as a superclass or superinterface, or
as a qualifier within a superclass or superinterface name. A class C
depends on a reference type T if any of the following conditions hold:
class Point extends ColoredPoint { int x, y; }
class ColoredPoint extends Point { int color; }
causes a compile-time error.
If circularly declared classes are detected at run time,
as classes are loaded (§12.2),
then a ClassCircularityError is thrown.
implements clause in a class declaration lists the names of
interfaces that are direct superinterfaces of the class being declared:
Interfaces: implements InterfaceTypeList InterfaceTypeList: InterfaceType InterfaceTypeList , InterfaceTypeThe following is repeated from §4.3 to make the presentation here clearer:
InterfaceType: TypeNameEach InterfaceType must name an accessible (§6.6) interface type, or a compile-time error occurs.
A compile-time error occurs if the same interface is
mentioned two or more times in a single implements clause.
This is true even if the interface is named in different ways; for example, the code:
class Redundant implements java.lang.Cloneable, Cloneable {
int x;
}
results in a compile-time error because
the names java.lang.Cloneable and Cloneable refer to
the same interface.
An interface type I is a superinterface of class type C if any of the following is true:
public interface Colorable {
void setColor(int color);
int getColor();
}
public interface Paintable extends Colorable {
int MATTE = 0, GLOSSY = 1;
void setFinish(int finish);
int getFinish();
}
class Point { int x, y; }
class ColoredPoint extends Point implements Colorable {
int color;
public void setColor(int color) { this.color = color; }
public int getColor() { return color; }
}
class PaintedPoint extends ColoredPoint implements Paintable
{
int finish;
public void setFinish(int finish) {
this.finish = finish;
}
public int getFinish() { return finish; }
}
the relationships are as follows:
Paintable is a superinterface of class
PaintedPoint.
Colorable is a superinterface of class
ColoredPoint and of class PaintedPoint.
Paintable is a subinterface of the interface
Colorable, and Colorable is a superinterface of
Paintable, as defined in §9.1.2.
PaintedPoint has
Colorable as a superinterface both because it is a superinterface
of ColoredPoint and because it is a superinterface of
Paintable.
Unless the class being declared is abstract,
the declarations of all the method members of each direct superinterface must be
implemented either by a declaration in this class or by an existing method
declaration inherited from the direct superclass, because a class that is not
abstract is not permitted to have abstract methods (§8.1.1.1).
interface Colorable {
void setColor(int color);
int getColor();
}
class Point { int x, y; };
class ColoredPoint extends Point implements Colorable {
int color;
}
causes a compile-time error, because
ColoredPoint is not an abstract class but it fails to
provide an implementation of methods setColor and
getColor of the interface Colorable.
It is permitted for a single method declaration in a class to implement methods of more than one superinterface. For example, in the code:
interface Fish { int getNumberOfScales(); }
interface Piano { int getNumberOfScales(); }
class Tuna implements Fish, Piano {
// You can tune a piano, but can you tuna fish?
int getNumberOfScales() { return 91; }
}
the method getNumberOfScales
in class Tuna has a name, signature, and return type that matches
the method declared in interface Fish and also matches the method
declared in interface Piano; it is considered to implement both.
On the other hand, in a situation such as this:
interface Fish { int getNumberOfScales(); }
interface StringBass { double getNumberOfScales(); }
class Bass implements Fish, StringBass {
// This declaration cannot be correct, no matter what type is used.
public ??? getNumberOfScales() { return 91; }
}
It is impossible to declare a method named
getNumberOfScales with the same signature and return type as those
of both the methods declared in interface Fish and in interface
StringBass, because a class can have only one method with a given
signature (§8.4).
Therefore, it is impossible for a single class to implement both interface
Fish and interface StringBass (§8.4.6).
ClassBody:
{ ClassBodyDeclarationsopt }
ClassBodyDeclarations:
ClassBodyDeclaration
ClassBodyDeclarations ClassBodyDeclaration
ClassBodyDeclaration:
ClassMemberDeclaration
InstanceInitializer
StaticInitializer
ConstructorDeclaration
ClassMemberDeclaration:
FieldDeclaration
MethodDeclaration
ClassDeclaration
InterfaceDeclaration
;
The scope of a declaration of a member m declared
in or inherited by a class type C is the entire body of C, including any
nested type declarations.
If C itself is a nested class, there may be definitions of the same kind (variable, method, or type) for m in enclosing scopes. (The scopes may be blocks, classes, or packages.) In all such cases, the member m declared or inherited in C shadows (§6.3.1) the other definitions of m.
Object, which has no direct superclass
private are not inherited by subclasses of that class. Only members
of a class that are declared protected or public are
inherited by subclasses declared in a package other than the one in which the
class is declared.
Constructors, static initializers, and instance initializers are not members and therefore are not inherited.
class Point {
int x, y;
private Point() { reset(); }
Point(int x, int y) { this.x = x; this.y = y; }
private void reset() { this.x = 0; this.y = 0; }
}
class ColoredPoint extends Point {
int color;
void clear() { reset(); } // error
}
class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
ColoredPoint c = new ColoredPoint(0, 0); // error
c.reset(); // error
}
}
causes four compile-time errors:
ColoredPoint has no constructor
declared with two integer parameters, as requested by the use in
main. This illustrates the fact that ColoredPoint
does not inherit the constructors of its superclass Point.
ColoredPoint declares no
constructors, and therefore a default constructor for it is automatically
created (§8.8.7),
and this default constructor is equivalent to: ColoredPoint() { super(); }
which invokes the constructor, with no
arguments, for the direct superclass of the class ColoredPoint. The
error is that the constructor for Point that takes no arguments is
private, and therefore is not accessible outside the class
Point, even through a superclass constructor invocation (§8.8.5).
Two more errors occur because the method reset
of class Point is private, and therefore is not
inherited by class ColoredPoint. The method invocations in method
clear of class ColoredPoint and in method
main of class Test are therefore not correct.
points package
declares two compilation units:
package points;
public class Point {
int x, y;
public void move(int dx, int dy) { x += dx; y += dy; }
}
and:
package points;
public class Point3d extends Point {
int z;
public void move(int dx, int dy, int dz) {
x += dx; y += dy; z += dz;
}
}
and a third compilation unit, in another
package, is:
import points.Point3d;
class Point4d extends Point3d {
int w;
public void move(int dx, int dy, int dz, int dw) {
x += dx; y += dy; z += dz; w += dw; // compile-time errors
}
}
Here both classes in the
points package compile. The class Point3d inherits the
fields x and y of class Point, because it
is in the same package as Point. The class Point4d,
which is in a different package, does not inherit the fields x and
y of class Point or the field z of class
Point3d, and so fails to compile.
A better way to write the third compilation unit would be:
import points.Point3d;
class Point4d extends Point3d {
int w;
public void move(int dx, int dy, int dz, int dw) {
super.move(dx, dy, dz); w += dw;
}
}
using the move method of the
superclass Point3d to process dx, dy, and
dz. If Point4d is written in this way it will compile
without errors.
Point:
package points;
public class Point {
public int x, y;
protected int useCount = 0;
static protected int totalUseCount = 0;
public void move(int dx, int dy) {
x += dx; y += dy; useCount++; totalUseCount++;
}
}
the public and
protected fields x, y,
useCount and totalUseCount are inherited in all
subclasses of Point.
Therefore, this test program, in another package, can be compiled successfully:
class Test extends points.Point {
public void moveBack(int dx, int dy) {
x -= dx; y -= dy; useCount++; totalUseCount++;
}
}
class Point {
int x, y;
void move(int dx, int dy) {
x += dx; y += dy; totalMoves++;
}
private static int totalMoves;
void printMoves() { System.out.println(totalMoves); }
}
class Point3d extends Point {
int z;
void move(int dx, int dy, int dz) {
super.move(dx, dy); z += dz; totalMoves++;
}
}
the class variable totalMoves
can be used only within the class Point; it is not inherited by the
subclass Point3d. A compile-time error occurs because method
move of class Point3d tries to increment
totalMoves.
public, instances of the class
might be available at run time to code outside the package in which it is
declared if it has a public superclass or superinterface. An
instance of the class can be assigned to a variable of such a
public type. An invocation of a public method of the
object referred to by such a variable may invoke a method of the class if it
implements or overrides a method of the public superclass or
superinterface. (In this situation, the method is necessarily declared
public, even though it is declared in a class that is not
public.)
Consider the compilation unit:
package points;
public class Point {
public int x, y;
public void move(int dx, int dy) {
x += dx; y += dy;
}
}
and another compilation unit of another
package:
package morePoints;
class Point3d extends points.Point {
public int z;
public void move(int dx, int dy, int dz) {
super.move(dx, dy); z += dz;
}
public void move(int dx, int dy) {
move(dx, dy, 0);
}
}
public class OnePoint {
public static points.Point getOne() {
return new Point3d();
}
}
An invocation
morePoints.OnePoint.getOne() in yet a third package would return a
Point3d that can be used as a Point, even though the
type Point3d is not available outside the package
morePoints. The two argument version of method move
could then be invoked for that object, which is permissible because method
move of Point3d is public (as it must be,
for any method that overrides a public method must itself be
public, precisely so that situations such as this will work out
correctly). The fields x and y of that object could
also be accessed from such a third package.
While the field z of class
Point3d is public, it is not possible to access this
field from code outside the package morePoints, given only a
reference to an instance of class Point3d in a variable
p of type Point. This is because the expression
p.z is not correct, as p has type Point
and class Point has no field named z; also, the
expression ((Point3d)p).z is not correct, because the class type
Point3d cannot be referred to outside package
morePoints.
The declaration of the field z as public is not
useless, however. If there were to be, in package morePoints, a
public subclass Point4d of the class
Point3d:
package morePoints;
public class Point4d extends Point3d {
public int w;
public void move(int dx, int dy, int dz, int dw) {
super.move(dx, dy, dz); w += dw;
}
}
then class Point4d would
inherit the field z, which, being public, could then
be accessed by code in packages other than morePoints, through
variables and expressions of the public type Point4d.
FieldDeclaration: FieldModifiersopt Type VariableDeclarators ; VariableDeclarators: VariableDeclarator VariableDeclarators , VariableDeclarator VariableDeclarator: VariableDeclaratorId VariableDeclaratorId = VariableInitializer VariableDeclaratorId: Identifier VariableDeclaratorId [ ] VariableInitializer: Expression ArrayInitializerThe FieldModifiers are described in §8.3.1. The Identifier in a FieldDeclarator may be used in a name to refer to the field. Fields are members; the scope (§6.3) of a field declaration is specified in §8.1.5. More than one field may be declared in a single field declaration by using more than one declarator; the FieldModifiers and Type apply to all the declarators in the declaration. Variable declarations involving array types are discussed in §10.2.
It is a compile-time error for the body of a class declaration to declare two fields with the same name. Methods, types, and fields may have the same name, since they are used in different contexts and are disambiguated by different lookup procedures (§6.5).
If the class declares a field with a certain name, then the declaration of that field is said to hide any and all accessible declarations of fields with the same name in superclasses, and superinterfaces of the class. The field declaration also shadows (§6.3.1) declarations of any accessible fields in enclosing classes or interfaces, and any local variables, formal method parameters, and exception handler parameters with the same name in any enclosing blocks.
If a field declaration hides the declaration of another field, the two fields need not have the same type.
A class inherits from its direct superclass and direct superinterfaces all the non-private fields of the superclass and superinterfaces that are both accessible to code in the class and not hidden by a declaration in the class.
Note that a private field of a superclass might be accessible to a subclass (for example, if both classes are members of the same class). Nevertheless, a private field is never inherited by a subclass.
It is possible for a class to inherit more than one field with the same name (§8.3.3.3). Such a situation does not in itself cause a compile-time error. However, any attempt within the body of the class to refer to any such field by its simple name will result in a compile-time error, because such a reference is ambiguous.
There might be several paths by which the same field declaration might be inherited from an interface. In such a situation, the field is considered to be inherited only once, and it may be referred to by its simple name without ambiguity.
A hidden field can be accessed by using a qualified name (if it is
static) or by using a field access expression (§15.11)
that contains the keyword super or a cast to a superclass type. See
§15.11.2
for discussion and an example.
A value stored in a field of type float is always an element of
the float value set (§4.2.3);
similarly, a value stored in a field of type double is always an
element of the double value set. It is not permitted for a field of type
float to contain an element of the float-extended-exponent value
set that is not also an element of the float value set, nor for a field of type
double to contain an element of the double-extended-exponent value
set that is not also an element of the double value set.
FieldModifiers: FieldModifier FieldModifiers FieldModifier FieldModifier: one of public protected private static final transient volatileThe access modifiers
public,
protected, and private are discussed in §6.6.
A compile-time error occurs if the same modifier appears more than once in a
field declaration, or if a field declaration has more than one of the access
modifiers public, protected, and private.
If two or more (distinct) field modifiers appear in a field declaration, it is customary, though not required, that they appear in the order consistent with that shown above in the production for FieldModifier.
static Fieldsstatic, there exists exactly one incarnation of the field,
no matter how many instances (possibly zero) of the class may eventually be
created. A static field, sometimes called a class
variable, is incarnated when the class is initialized (§12.4).
A field that is not declared static
(sometimes called a non-static field) is called an instance
variable. Whenever a new instance of a class is created, a new variable
associated with that instance is created for every instance variable declared in
that class or any of its superclasses. The example program:
class Point {
int x, y, useCount;
Point(int x, int y) { this.x = x; this.y = y; }
final static Point origin = new Point(0, 0);
}
class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Point p = new Point(1,1);
Point q = new Point(2,2);
p.x = 3; p.y = 3; p.useCount++; p.origin.useCount++;
System.out.println("(" + q.x + "," + q.y + ")");
System.out.println(q.useCount);
System.out.println(q.origin == Point.origin);
System.out.println(q.origin.useCount);
}
}
prints:
showing that changing the fields(2,2) 0 true 1
x, y, and useCount of p does
not affect the fields of q, because these fields are instance
variables in distinct objects. In this example, the class variable
origin of the class Point is referenced both using the
class name as a qualifier, in Point.origin, and using variables of
the class type in field access expressions (§15.11),
as in p.origin and q.origin. These two ways of
accessing the origin class variable access the same object,
evidenced by the fact that the value of the reference equality expression (§15.21.3):
isq.origin==Point.origin
true. Further
evidence is that the incrementation:
causes the value ofp.origin.useCount++;
q.origin.useCount to be 1; this is so because
p.origin and q.origin refer to the same variable.
final Fieldsfinal (§4.5.4).
Both class and instance variables (static and
non-static fields) may be declared final.
It is a compile-time error if a blank final (§4.5.4) class variable is not definitely assigned (§16.7) by a static initializer (§8.7) of the class in which it is declared.
A blank final instance variable must be definitely assigned (§16.8) at the end of every constructor (§8.8) of the class in which it is declared; otherwise a compile-time error occurs.
transient Fieldstransient to indicate that they are not part of the
persistent state of an object.
If an instance of the class Point:
class Point {
int x, y;
transient float rho, theta;
}
were saved to persistent storage by a
system service, then only the fields x and y would be
saved. This specification does not specify details of such services; see the
specification of java.io.Serializable for an example of such a service.
volatile FieldsThe Java programming language provides a second mechanism, volatile fields, that is more convenient for some purposes.
A field may be declared volatile, in which case a thread must
reconcile its working copy of the field with the master copy every time it
accesses the variable. Moreover, operations on the master copies of one or more
volatile variables on behalf of a thread are performed by the main memory in
exactly the order that the thread requested.
If, in the following example, one thread repeatedly calls
the method one (but no more than Integer.MAX_VALUE
times in all), and another thread repeatedly calls the method two:
class Test {
static int i = 0, j = 0;
static void one() { i++; j++; }
static void two() {
System.out.println("i=" + i + " j=" + j);
}
}
then method two could
occasionally print a value for j that is greater than the value of
i, because the example includes no synchronization and, under the
rules explained in §17,
the shared values of i and j might be updated out of
order.
One way to prevent this out-or-order behavior would be to
declare methods one and two to be
synchronized (§8.4.3.6):
class Test {
static int i = 0, j = 0;
static synchronized void one() { i++; j++; }
static synchronized void two() {
System.out.println("i=" + i + " j=" + j);
}
}
This prevents method one and
method two from being executed concurrently, and furthermore
guarantees that the shared values of i and j are both
updated before method one returns. Therefore method
two never observes a value for j greater than that for
i; indeed, it always observes the same value for i and
j.
Another approach would be to declare i and
j to be volatile:
class Test {
static volatile int i = 0, j = 0;
static void one() { i++; j++; }
static void two() {
System.out.println("i=" + i + " j=" + j);
}
}
This allows method one and
method two to be executed concurrently, but guarantees that
accesses to the shared values for i and j occur
exactly as many times, and in exactly the same order, as they appear to occur
during execution of the program text by each thread. Therefore, the shared value
for j is never greater than that for i, because each
update to i must be reflected in the shared value for
i before the update to j occurs. It is possible,
however, that any given invocation of method two might observe a
value for j that is much greater than the value observed for
i, because method one might be executed many times
between the moment when method two fetches the value of
i and the moment when method two fetches the value of
j. See §17
for more discussion and examples.
A compile-time error occurs if a final
variable is also declared volatile.
static
field), then the variable initializer is evaluated and the assignment
performed exactly once, when the class is initialized (§12.4).
static), then the variable initializer is evaluated and the
assignment performed each time an instance of the class is created (§12.5).
The example: class Point {
int x = 1, y = 5;
}
class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Point p = new Point();
System.out.println(p.x + ", " + p.y);
}
}
produces the output:
because the assignments to1, 5
x
and y occur whenever a new Point is created.
Variable initializers are also used in local variable declaration statements (§14.4), where the initializer is evaluated and the assignment performed each time the local variable declaration statement is executed.
It is a compile-time error if the evaluation of a variable
initializer for a static field or for an instance variable of a
named class (or of an interface) can complete abruptly with a checked exception
(§11.2).
If the keyword this (§15.8.3)
or the keyword super (§15.11.2,
§15.12)
occurs in an initialization expression for a class variable, then a compile-time
error occurs.
One subtlety here is that, at run time,
static variables that are final and that are
initialized with compile-time constant values are initialized first. This also
applies to such fields in interfaces (§9.3.1).
These variables are "constants" that will never be observed to have their
default initial values (§4.5.5),
even by devious programs. See §12.4.2
and §13.4.8
for more discussion. Use of class variables whose
declarations appear textually after the use is sometimes restricted, even though
these class variables are in scope. See §8.3.2.3
for the precise rules governing forward reference to class variables.
static variable declared in or inherited by the
class, even one whose declaration occurs textually later.
class Test {
float f = j;
static int j = 1;
}
compiles without error; it initializes
j to 1 when class Test is initialized,
and initializes f to the current value of j every time
an instance of class Test is created.
Initialization expressions for instance variables are
permitted to refer to the current object this (§15.8.3)
and to use the keyword super (§15.11.2,
§15.12).
Use of instance variables whose declarations appear textually after the use is sometimes restricted, even though these instance variables are in scope. See §8.3.2.3 for the precise rules governing forward reference to instance variables.
static) field of a
class or interface C and all of the following conditions hold:
static)
variable initializer of C or in an instance (respectively
static) initializer of C.
This means that a compile-time error results from the test program:
class Test {
int i = j; // compile-time error: incorrect forward reference
int j = 1;
}
whereas the following example compiles
without error:
class Test {
Test() { k = 2; }
int j = 1;
int i = j;
int k;
}
even though the constructor (§8.8)
for Test refers to the field k that is declared three
lines later.
These restrictions are designed to catch, at compile time, circular or otherwise malformed initializations. Thus, both:
class Z {
static int i = j + 2;
static int j = 4;
}
and:
class Z {
static { i = j + 2; }
static int i, j;
static { j = 4; }
}
result in compile-time errors. Accesses by
methods are not checked in this way, so:
class Z {
static int peek() { return j; }
static int i = peek();
static int j = 1;
}
class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(Z.i);
}
}
produces the output:
because the variable initializer for0
i uses the class method peek to access the value of
the variable j before j has been initialized by its
variable initializer, at which point it still has its default value (§4.5.5).
class UseBeforeDeclaration {
static {
x = 100; // ok - assignment
int y = x + 1; // error - read before declaration
int v = x = 3; // ok - x at left hand side of assignment
int z = UseBeforeDeclaration.x * 2;
// ok - not accessed via simple name
Object o = new Object(){
void foo(){x++;} // ok - occurs in a different class
{x++;} // ok - occurs in a different class
};
}
{
j = 200; // ok - assignment
j = j + 1; // error - right hand side reads before declaration
int k = j = j + 1;
int n = j = 300; // ok - j at left hand side of assignment
int h = j++; // error - read before declaration
int l = this.j * 3; // ok - not accessed via simple name
Object o = new Object(){
void foo(){j++;} // ok - occurs in a different class
{ j = j + 1;} // ok - occurs in a different class
};
}
int w = x= 3; // ok - x at left hand side of assignment
int p = x; // ok - instance initializers may access static fields
static int u = (new Object(){int bar(){return x;}}).bar();
// ok - occurs in a different class
static int x;
int m = j = 4; // ok - j at left hand side of assignment
int o = (new Object(){int bar(){return j;}}).bar();
// ok - occurs in a different class
int j;
}
class Point {
static int x = 2;
}
class Test extends Point {
static double x = 4.7;
public static void main(String[] args) {
new Test().printX();
}
void printX() {
System.out.println(x + " " + super.x);
}
}
produces the output:
because the declaration of4.7 2
x
in class Test hides the definition of x in class
Point, so class Test does not inherit the field
x from its superclass Point. Within the declaration of
class Test, the simple name x refers to the field
declared within class Test. Code in class Test may
refer to the field x of class Point as
super.x (or, because x is static, as
Point.x). If the declaration of Test.x is deleted:
class Point {
static int x = 2;
}
class Test extends Point {
public static void main(String[] args) {
new Test().printX();
}
void printX() {
System.out.println(x + " " + super.x);
}
}
then the field x of class
Point is no longer hidden within class Test; instead,
the simple name x now refers to the field Point.x.
Code in class Test may still refer to that same field as
super.x. Therefore, the output from this variant program is:
2 2
class Point {
int x = 2;
}
class Test extends Point {
double x = 4.7;
void printBoth() {
System.out.println(x + " " + super.x);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Test sample = new Test();
sample.printBoth();
System.out.println(sample.x + " " +
((Point)sample).x);
}
}
produces the output:
because the declaration of4.7 2 4.7 2
x
in class Test hides the definition of x in class
Point, so class Test does not inherit the field
x from its superclass Point. It must be noted,
however, that while the field x of class Point is not
inherited by class Test, it is nevertheless
implemented by instances of class Test. In other words,
every instance of class Test contains two fields, one of type
int and one of type float. Both fields bear the name
x, but within the declaration of class Test, the
simple name x always refers to the field declared within class
Test. Code in instance methods of class Test may refer
to the instance variable x of class Point as
super.x.
Code that uses a field access expression to access field
x will access the field named x in the class indicated
by the type of reference expression. Thus, the expression sample.x
accesses a float value, the instance variable declared in class
Test, because the type of the variable sample is Test,
but the expression ((Point)sample).x accesses an int
value, the instance variable declared in class Point, because of
the cast to type Point.
If the declaration of x is deleted from class Test,
as in the program:
class Point {
static int x = 2;
}
class Test extends Point {
void printBoth() {
System.out.println(x + " " + super.x);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Test sample = new Test();
sample.printBoth();
System.out.println(sample.x + " " +
((Point)sample).x);
}
}
then the field x of class
Point is no longer hidden within class Test. Within
instance methods in the declaration of class Test, the simple name
x now refers to the field declared within class Point.
Code in class Test may still refer to that same field as
super.x. The expression sample.x still refers to the
field x within type Test, but that field is now an
inherited field, and so refers to the field x declared in class
Point. The output from this variant program is:
2 2 2 2
super (§15.11.2)
may be used to access such fields unambiguously. In the example:
interface Frob { float v = 2.0f; }
class SuperTest { int v = 3; }
class Test extends SuperTest implements Frob {
public static void main(String[] args) {
new Test().printV();
}
void printV() { System.out.println(v); }
}
the class Test inherits two
fields named v, one from its superclass SuperTest and
one from its superinterface Frob. This in itself is permitted, but
a compile-time error occurs because of the use of the simple name v
in method printV: it cannot be determined which v is
intended.
The following variation uses the field access expression
super.v to refer to the field named v declared in
class SuperTest and uses the qualified name Frob.v to
refer to the field named v declared in interface Frob:
interface Frob { float v = 2.0f; }
class SuperTest { int v = 3; }
class Test extends SuperTest implements Frob {
public static void main(String[] args) {
new Test().printV();
}
void printV() {
System.out.println((super.v + Frob.v)/2);
}
}
It compiles and prints:
Even if two distinct inherited fields have the same type, the same value, and are both2.5
final, any reference to
either field by simple name is considered ambiguous and results in a
compile-time error. In the example:
interface Color { int RED=0, GREEN=1, BLUE=2; }
interface TrafficLight { int RED=0, YELLOW=1, GREEN=2; }
class Test implements Color, TrafficLight {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(GREEN); // compile-time error
System.out.println(RED); // compile-time error
}
}
it is not astonishing that the reference to
GREEN should be considered ambiguous, because class
Test inherits two different declarations for GREEN
with different values. The point of this example is that the reference to
RED is also considered ambiguous, because two distinct declarations
are inherited. The fact that the two fields named RED happen to
have the same type and the same unchanging value does not affect this judgment.
public interface Colorable {
int RED = 0xff0000, GREEN = 0x00ff00, BLUE = 0x0000ff;
}
public interface Paintable extends Colorable {
int MATTE = 0, GLOSSY = 1;
}
class Point { int x, y; }
class ColoredPoint extends Point implements Colorable {
. . .
}
class PaintedPoint extends ColoredPoint implements Paintable
{
. . . RED . . .
}
the fields RED,
GREEN, and BLUE are inherited by the class
PaintedPoint both through its direct superclass
ColoredPoint and through its direct superinterface
Paintable. The simple names RED, GREEN,
and BLUE may nevertheless be used without ambiguity within the
class PaintedPoint to refer to the fields declared in interface
Colorable.
MethodDeclaration: MethodHeader MethodBody MethodHeader: MethodModifiersopt ResultType MethodDeclarator Throwsopt ResultType: Type void MethodDeclarator: Identifer ( FormalParameterListopt )The MethodModifiers are described in §8.4.3, the Throws clause in §8.4.4, and the MethodBody in §8.4.5. A method declaration either specifies the type of value that the method returns or uses the keyword
void to indicate that the method does not
return a value.
The Identifier in a MethodDeclarator may be used in a name to refer to the method. A class can declare a method with the same name as the class or a field, member class or member interface of the class.
For compatibility with older versions of the Java platform, a declaration form for a method that returns an array is allowed to place (some or all of) the empty bracket pairs that form the declaration of the array type after the parameter list. This is supported by the obsolescent production:
MethodDeclarator: MethodDeclarator [ ]but should not be used in new code.
It is a compile-time error for the body of a class to have as members two methods with the same signature (§8.4.2) (name, number of parameters, and types of any parameters). Methods and fields may have the same name, since they are used in different contexts and are disambiguated by the different lookup procedures (§6.5).
FormalParameterList: FormalParameter FormalParameterList , FormalParameter FormalParameter: finalopt Type VariableDeclaratorIdThe following is repeated from §8.3 to make the presentation here clearer:
VariableDeclaratorId: Identifier VariableDeclaratorId [ ]If a method or constructor has no parameters, only an empty pair of parentheses appears in the declaration of the method or constructor.
If two formal parameters of the same method or constructor are declared to have the same name (that is, their declarations mention the same Identifier), then a compile-time error occurs.
It is a compile-time error if a method or constructor parameter that is declared final is assigned to within the body of the method or constructor.
When the method or constructor is invoked (§15.12), the values of the actual argument expressions initialize newly created parameter variables, each of the declared Type, before execution of the body of the method or constructor. The Identifier that appears in the DeclaratorId may be used as a simple name in the body of the method or constructor to refer to the formal parameter.
The scope of a parameter of a method (§8.4.1) or constructor (§8.8.1) is the entire body of the method or constructor.
These parameter names may not be redeclared as local variables of the method, or as exception parameters of catch clauses in a try statement of the method or constructor. However, a parameter of a method or constructor may be shadowed anywhere inside a class declaration nested within that method or constructor. Such a nested class declaration could declare either a local class (§14.3) or an anonymous class (§15.9).
Formal parameters are referred to only using simple names, never by using qualified names (§6.6).
A method or constructor parameter of type
float always contains an element of the float value set (§4.2.3);
similarly, a method or constructor parameter of type double always
contains an element of the double value set. It is not permitted for a method or
constructor parameter of type float to contain an element of the
float-extended-exponent value set that is not also an element of the float value
set, nor for a method parameter of type double to contain an
element of the double-extended-exponent value set that is not also an element of
the double value set.
Where an actual argument expression corresponding to a parameter variable is not FP-strict (§15.4), evaluation of that actual argument expression is permitted to use intermediate values drawn from the appropriate extended-exponent value sets. Prior to being stored in the parameter variable the result of such an expression is mapped to the nearest value in the corresponding standard value set by method invocation conversion (§5.3).
class Point implements Move {
int x, y;
abstract void move(int dx, int dy);
void move(int dx, int dy) { x += dx; y += dy; }
}
causes a compile-time error because it
declares two move methods with the same signature. This is an error
even though one of the declarations is abstract.
MethodModifiers: MethodModifier MethodModifiers MethodModifier MethodModifier: one of public protected private abstract static final synchronized native strictfpThe access modifiers
public,
protected, and private are discussed in §6.6.
A compile-time error occurs if the same modifier appears more than once in a
method declaration, or if a method declaration has more than one of the access
modifiers public, protected, and private.
A compile-time error occurs if a method declaration that contains the keyword
abstract also contains any one of the keywords
private, static, final,
native, strictfp, or synchronized. A
compile-time error occurs if a method declaration that contains the keyword
native also contains strictfp.
If two or more method modifiers appear in a method declaration, it is customary, though not required, that they appear in the order consistent with that shown above in the production for MethodModifier.
abstract Methodsabstract method declaration introduces the method as a member,
providing its signature (name and number and type of parameters), return type,
and throws clause (if any), but does not provide an implementation.
The declaration of an abstract method m must appear directly
within an abstract class (call it A); otherwise a
compile-time error results. Every subclass of A that is not
abstract must provide an implementation for m, or a
compile-time error occurs as specified in §8.1.1.1.
It is a compile-time error for a private
method to be declared abstract.
It would be impossible for a subclass to implement a
private abstract method, because private
methods are not inherited by subclasses; therefore such a method could never be
used.
It is a compile-time error for a static method to be declared
abstract.
It is a compile-time error for a final method
to be declared abstract.
An abstract class can override an
abstract method by providing another abstract method
declaration.
This can provide a place to put a documentation comment, or to declare that the set of checked exceptions (§11.2) that can be thrown by that method, when it is implemented by its subclasses, is to be more limited. For example, consider this code:
class BufferEmpty extends Exception {
BufferEmpty() { super(); }
BufferEmpty(String s) { super(s); }
}
class BufferError extends Exception {
BufferError() { super(); }
BufferError(String s) { super(s); }
}
public interface Buffer {
char get() throws BufferEmpty, BufferError;
}
public abstract class InfiniteBuffer implements Buffer {
abstract char get() throws BufferError;
}
The overriding declaration of method
get in class InfiniteBuffer states that method
get in any subclass of InfiniteBuffer never throws a
BufferEmpty exception, putatively because it generates the data in
the buffer, and thus can never run out of data. An instance
method that is not abstract can be overridden by an
abstract method.
For example, we can declare an abstract class
Point that requires its subclasses to implement
toString if they are to be complete, instantiable classes:
abstract class Point {
int x, y;
public abstract String toString();
}
This abstract declaration of
toString overrides the non-abstract
toString method of class Object. (Class
Object is the implicit direct superclass of class
Point.) Adding the code:
class ColoredPoint extends Point {
int color;
public String toString() {
return super.toString() + ": color " + color; // error
}
}
results in a compile-time error because the
invocation super.toString() refers to method toString
in class Point, which is abstract and therefore cannot
be invoked. Method toString of class Object can be
made available to class ColoredPoint only if class
Point explicitly makes it available through some other method, as
in:
abstract class Point {
int x, y;
public abstract String toString();
protected String objString() { return super.toString(); }
}
class ColoredPoint extends Point {
int color;
public String toString() {
return objString() + ": color " + color; // correct
}
}
static Methodsstatic is called a class method. A class method
is always invoked without reference to a particular object. An attempt to
reference the current object using the keyword this or the keyword
super in the body of a class method results in a compile-time
error. It is a compile-time error for a static method to be
declared abstract.
A method that is not declared static is called
an instance method, and sometimes called a non-static
method. An instance method is always invoked with respect to an object, which
becomes the current object to which the keywords this and
super refer during execution of the method body.
final Methodsfinal to prevent subclasses from overriding or hiding it.
It is a compile-time error to attempt to override or hide a final
method.
A private method and all methods declared in a
final class (§8.1.1.2)
are implicitly final, because it is impossible to override them. It
is permitted but not required for the declarations of such methods to
redundantly include the final keyword.
It is a compile-time error for a final method
to be declared abstract.
At run time, a machine-code generator or optimizer can
"inline" the body of a final method, replacing an invocation of the
method with the code in its body. The inlining process must preserve the
semantics of the method invocation. In particular, if the target of an instance
method invocation is null, then a NullPointerException
must be thrown even if the method is inlined. The compiler must ensure that the
exception will be thrown at the correct point, so that the actual arguments to
the method will be seen to have been evaluated in the correct order prior to the
method invocation.
final class Point {
int x, y;
void move(int dx, int dy) { x += dx; y += dy; }
}
class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Point[] p = new Point[100];
for (int i = 0; i < p.length; i++) {
p[i] = new Point();
p[i].move(i, p.length-1-i);
}
}
}
Here, inlining the method move
of class Point in method main would transform the
for loop to the form:
for (int i = 0; i < p.length; i++) {
p[i] = new Point();
Point pi = p[i];
int j = p.length-1-i;
pi.x += i;
pi.y += j;
}
The loop might then be subject to further
optimizations.
Such inlining cannot be done at compile time unless it can
be guaranteed that Test and Point will always be
recompiled together, so that whenever Point-and specifically its
move method-changes, the code for Test.main will also
be updated.
native Methodsnative is implemented in platform-dependent code, typically written
in another programming language such as C, C++, FORTRAN, or assembly language.
The body of a native method is given as a semicolon only,
indicating that the implementation is omitted, instead of a block.
A compile-time error occurs if a native method
is declared abstract.
For example, the class RandomAccessFile of the
package java.io might declare the following native
methods:
package java.io;
public class RandomAccessFile
implements DataOutput, DataInput
{ . . .
public native void open(String name, boolean writeable)
throws IOException;
public native int readBytes(byte[] b, int off, int len)
throws IOException;
public native void writeBytes(byte[] b, int off, int len)
throws IOException;
public native long getFilePointer() throws IOException;
public native void seek(long pos) throws IOException;
public native long length() throws IOException;
public native void close() throws IOException;
}
strictfp Methodsstrictfp modifier is to make all float or
double expressions within the method body be explicitly FP-strict
(§15.4).
synchronized Methodssynchronized method acquires a lock (§17.1)
before it executes. For a class (static) method, the lock
associated with the Class object for the method's class is used.
For an instance method, the lock associated with this (the object
for which the method was invoked) is used.
These are the same locks that can be used by the
synchronized statement (§14.18);
thus, the code:
class Test {
int count;
synchronized void bump() { count++; }
static int classCount;
static synchronized void classBump() {
classCount++;
}
}
has exactly the same effect as:
class BumpTest {
int count;
void bump() {
synchronized (this) {
count++;
}
}
static int classCount;
static void classBump() {
try {
synchronized (Class.forName("BumpTest")) {
classCount++;
}
} catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
...
}
}
}
The more elaborate example:
public class Box {
private Object boxContents;
public synchronized Object get() {
Object contents = boxContents;
boxContents = null;
return contents;
}
public synchronized boolean put(Object contents) {
if (boxContents != null)
return false;
boxContents = contents;
return true;
}
}
defines a class which is designed for
concurrent use. Each instance of the class Box has an instance
variable contents that can hold a reference to any object. You can
put an object in a Box by invoking put, which returns
false if the box is already full. You can get something out of a
Box by invoking get, which returns a null reference if
the box is empty.
If put and get were not
synchronized, and two threads were executing methods for the same
instance of Box at the same time, then the code could misbehave. It
might, for example, lose track of an object because two invocations to
put occurred at the same time.
See §17 for more discussion of threads and locks.
Throws: throws ClassTypeList ClassTypeList: ClassType ClassTypeList , ClassTypeA compile-time error occurs if any ClassType mentioned in a
throws clause is not the class
Throwable or a subclass of Throwable. It is permitted
but not required to mention other (unchecked) exceptions in a
throws clause.
For each checked exception that can result from execution
of the body of a method or constructor, a compile-time error occurs unless that
exception type or a superclass of that exception type is mentioned in a
throws clause in the declaration of the method or constructor.
The requirement to declare checked exceptions allows the
compiler to ensure that code for handling such error conditions has been
included. Methods or constructors that fail to handle exceptional conditions
thrown as checked exceptions will normally result in a compile-time error
because of the lack of a proper exception type in a throws clause.
The Java programming language thus encourages a programming style where rare and
otherwise truly exceptional conditions are documented in this way.
The predefined exceptions that are not checked in this way are those for which declaring every possible occurrence would be unimaginably inconvenient:
Error, for example OutOfMemoryError, are thrown due
to a failure in or of the virtual machine. Many of these are the result of
linkage failures and can occur at unpredictable points in the execution of a
program. Sophisticated programs may yet wish to catch and attempt to recover
from some of these conditions.
RuntimeException, for example NullPointerException,
result from run-time integrity checks and are thrown either directly from the
program or in library routines. It is beyond the scope of the Java programming
language, and perhaps beyond the state of the art, to include sufficient
information in the program to reduce to a manageable number the places where
these can be proven not to occur. abstract methods defined in
interfaces, may not be declared to throw more checked exceptions than the
overridden or hidden method.
More precisely, suppose that B is a class or
interface, and A is a superclass or superinterface of B, and a
method declaration n in B overrides or hides a method declaration
m in A. If n has a throws clause that mentions
any checked exception types, then m must have a throws
clause, and for every checked exception type listed in the throws
clause of n, that same exception class or one of its superclasses must
occur in the throws clause of m; otherwise, a compile-time
error occurs.
See §11 for more information about exceptions and a large example.
abstract (§8.4.3.1)
or native (§8.4.3.4).
MethodBody: Block ;A compile-time error occurs if a method declaration is either
abstract or native and has a block for its
body. A compile-time error occurs if a method declaration is neither
abstract nor native and has a semicolon for its body.
If an implementation is to be provided for a method but the
implementation requires no executable code, the method body should be written as
a block that contains no statements: "{ }".
If a method is declared void, then its body must not contain any
return statement (§14.16)
that has an Expression.
If a method is declared to have a return type, then every
return statement (§14.16)
in its body must have an Expression. A compile-time error occurs if the
body of the method can complete normally (§14.1).
In other words, a method with a return type must return only by using a return statement that provides a value return; it is not allowed to "drop off the end of its body."
Note that it is possible for a method to have a declared return type and yet contain no return statements. Here is one example:
class DizzyDean {
int pitch() { throw new RuntimeException("90 mph?!"); }
}
abstract or not) of the superclass and
superinterfaces that are accessible to code in the class and are neither
overridden (§8.4.6.1)
nor hidden (§8.4.6.2)
by a declaration in the class.
abstract, then m1 is said to implement any and all
declarations of abstract methods that it overrides.
A compile-time error occurs if an instance method
overrides a static method.
In this respect, overriding of methods differs from hiding
of fields (§8.3),
for it is permissible for an instance variable to hide a static
variable.
An overridden method can be accessed by using a method invocation expression
(§15.12)
that contains the keyword super. Note that a qualified name or a
cast to a superclass type is not effective in attempting to access an overridden
method; in this respect, overriding of methods differs from hiding of fields.
See §15.12.4.9
for discussion and examples of this point.
The presence or absence of the strictfp modifier has absolutely
no effect on the rules for overriding methods and implementing abstract methods.
For example, it is permitted for a method that is not FP-strict to override an
FP-strict method and it is permitted for an FP-strict method to override a
method that is not FP-strict.
static method, then the declaration of that method is said to
hide any and all methods with the same signature in the superclasses
and superinterfaces of the class that would otherwise be accessible to code in
the class. A compile-time error occurs if a static method hides an
instance method.
In this respect, hiding of methods differs from hiding of
fields (§8.3),
for it is permissible for a static variable to hide an instance
variable. Hiding is also distinct from shadowing (§6.3.1)
and obscuring (§6.3.2).
A hidden method can be accessed by using a qualified name or by using a
method invocation expression (§15.12)
that contains the keyword super or a cast to a superclass type. In
this respect, hiding of methods is similar to hiding of fields.
void. Moreover, a method declaration
must not have a throws clause that conflicts (§8.4.4)
with that of any method that it overrides or hides; otherwise, a compile-time
error occurs.
In these respects, overriding of methods differs from hiding of fields (§8.3), for it is permissible for a field to hide a field of another type.
The access modifier (§6.6) of an overriding or hiding method must provide at least as much access as the overridden or hidden method, or a compile-time error occurs. In more detail:
public, then the
overriding or hiding method must be public; otherwise, a
compile-time error occurs.
protected, then the
overriding or hiding method must be protected or
public; otherwise, a compile-time error occurs.
private; otherwise, a
compile-time error occurs. private method cannot be hidden or overridden in the technical
sense of those terms. This means that a subclass can declare a method with the
same signature as a private method in one of its superclasses, and
there is no requirement that the return type or throws clause of
such a method bear any relationship to those of the private method
in the superclass.
abstract, then there
are two subcases:
abstract is static,
a compile-time error occurs.
abstract is considered to
override, and therefore to implement, all the other methods on behalf of the
class that inherits it. A compile-time error occurs if, comparing the method
that is not abstract with each of the other of the inherited
methods, for any such pair, either they have different return types or one
has a return type and the other is void. Moreover, a
compile-time error occurs if the inherited method that is not
abstract has a throws clause that conflicts (§8.4.4)
with that of any other of the inherited methods. abstract, then the class is
necessarily an abstract class and is considered to inherit all
the abstract methods. A compile-time error occurs if, for any two
such inherited methods, either they have different return types or one has a
return type and the other is void. (The throws
clauses do not cause errors in this case.) abstract, because methods that are not abstract are
inherited only from the direct superclass, not from superinterfaces.
There might be several paths by which the same method declaration might be inherited from an interface. This fact causes no difficulty and never, of itself, results in a compile-time error.
throws clauses of two
methods with the same name but different signatures.
Methods are overridden on a signature-by-signature basis.
If, for example, a class declares two public
methods with the same name, and a subclass overrides one of them, the subclass
still inherits the other method. In this respect, the Java programming language
differs from C++.
When a method is invoked (§15.12), the number of actual arguments and the compile-time types of the arguments are used, at compile time, to determine the signature of the method that will be invoked (§15.12.2). If the method that is to be invoked is an instance method, the actual method to be invoked will be determined at run time, using dynamic method lookup (§15.12.4).
class Point {
int x = 0, y = 0;
void move(int dx, int dy) { x += dx; y += dy; }
}
class SlowPoint extends Point {
int xLimit, yLimit;
void move(int dx, int dy) {
super.move(limit(dx, xLimit), limit(dy, yLimit));
}
static int limit(int d, int limit) {
return d > limit ? limit : d < -limit ? -limit : d;
}
}
the class SlowPoint overrides
the declarations of method move of class Point with
its own move method, which limits the distance that the point can
move on each invocation of the method. When the move method is
invoked for an instance of class SlowPoint, the overriding
definition in class SlowPoint will always be called, even if the
reference to the SlowPoint object is taken from a variable whose
type is Point.
class Point {
int x = 0, y = 0;
void move(int dx, int dy) { x += dx; y += dy; }
int color;
}
class RealPoint extends Point {
float x = 0.0f, y = 0.0f;
void move(int dx, int dy) { move((float)dx, (float)dy); }
void move(float dx, float dy) { x += dx; y += dy; }
}
the class RealPoint hides the
declarations of the int instance variables x and
y of class Point with its own float
instance variables x and y, and overrides the method
move of class Point with its own move
method. It also overloads the name move with another method with a
different signature (§8.4.2).
In this example, the members of the class
RealPoint include the instance variable color
inherited from the class Point, the float instance
variables x and y declared in RealPoint,
and the two move methods declared in RealPoint.
Which of these overloaded move methods of class
RealPoint will be chosen for any particular method invocation will
be determined at compile time by the overloading resolution procedure described
in §15.12.
class Point {
int x = 0, y = 0, color;
void move(int dx, int dy) { x += dx; y += dy; }
int getX() { return x; }
int getY() { return y; }
}
class RealPoint extends Point {
float x = 0.0f, y = 0.0f;
void move(int dx, int dy) { move((float)dx, (float)dy); }
void move(float dx, float dy) { x += dx; y += dy; }
float getX() { return x; }
float getY() { return y; }
}
Here the class Point provides
methods getX and getY that return the values of its
fields x and y; the class RealPoint then
overrides these methods by declaring methods with the same signature. The result
is two errors at compile time, one for each method, because the return types do
not match; the methods in class Point return values of type
int, but the wanna-be overriding methods in class
RealPoint return values of type float.
class Point {
int x = 0, y = 0;
void move(int dx, int dy) { x += dx; y += dy; }
int getX() { return x; }
int getY() { return y; }
int color;
}
class RealPoint extends Point {
float x = 0.0f, y = 0.0f;
void move(int dx, int dy) { move((float)dx, (float)dy); }
void move(float dx, float dy) { x += dx; y += dy; }
int getX() { return (int)Math.floor(x); }
int getY() { return (int)Math.floor(y); }
}
Here the overriding methods
getX and getY in class RealPoint have the
same return types as the methods of class Point that they override,
so this code can be successfully compiled.
Consider, then, this test program:
class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
RealPoint rp = new RealPoint();
Point p = rp;
rp.move(1.71828f, 4.14159f);
p.move(1, -1);
show(p.x, p.y);
show(rp.x, rp.y);
show(p.getX(), p.getY());
show(rp.getX(), rp.getY());
}
static void show(int x, int y) {
System.out.println("(" + x + ", " + y + ")");
}
static void show(float x, float y) {
System.out.println("(" + x + ", " + y + ")");
}
}
The output from this program is:
The first line of output illustrates the fact that an instance of(0, 0) (2.7182798, 3.14159) (2, 3) (2, 3)
RealPoint actually contains the two
integer fields declared in class Point; it is just that their names
are hidden from code that occurs within the declaration of class
RealPoint (and those of any subclasses it might have). When a
reference to an instance of class RealPoint in a variable of type
Point is used to access the field x, the integer field
x declared in class Point is accessed. The fact that
its value is zero indicates that the method invocation p.move(1,
-1) did not invoke the method move of class
Point; instead, it invoked the overriding method move
of class RealPoint.
The second line of output shows that the field access rp.x
refers to the field x declared in class RealPoint.
This field is of type float, and this second line of output
accordingly displays floating-point values. Incidentally, this also illustrates
the fact that the method name show is overloaded; the types of the
arguments in the method invocation dictate which of the two definitions will be
invoked.
The last two lines of output show that the method invocations
p.getX() and rp.getX() each invoke the
getX method declared in class RealPoint. Indeed, there
is no way to invoke the getX method of class Point for
an instance of class RealPoint from outside the body of
RealPoint, no matter what the type of the variable we may use to
hold the reference to the object. Thus, we see that fields and methods behave
differently: hiding is different from overriding.
static) method can be invoked by using a reference
whose type is the class that actually contains the declaration of the method. In
this respect, hiding of static methods is different from overriding of instance
methods. The example:
class Super {
static String greeting() { return "Goodnight"; }
String name() { return "Richard"; }
}
class